About these ads

Attempting to obey God and follow Jesus Christ our Lord

Posts tagged “roe-v-wade

We Know They Are Killing Children—All of Us Know – Desiring God

We Know They Are Killing Children—All of Us Know – Desiring God.

Related Posts

A Depraved Mind, Darkened in Understanding | the Cripplegate.

Feminist says baby is “a life worth sacrificing” | Denny Burk.

President Barack Obama’s Pro-Abortion Record: A Pro-Life Compilation | LifeNews.com.

Desiring God 2010

Desiring God 2010 (Photo credit: ahhyeah)

About these ads

Romney: I Want the Supreme Court to Overturn Roe v. Wade via Life News.com

Whether you believe Mr. Romney or not, he is the first Presidential hopeful in some time who has had the courage to make this statement. It would be a big step in turning this country in the right direction. We have spent the last four years with a pro death culture in control of this country. It is time to choose life!

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com

In an interview with the Columbus Dispatch newspaper, presidential candidate Mitt Romney said, once again, that he wants the Supreme Court to overturn the infamous Roe v. Wade decision that has paved the way for 55 million abortions.

Romney wants states to be able to protect unborn children and, in his interview with the newspaper, indicated overturning Roe was more possible in the current political climate than a Human Life Amendment.

“That’s not where America is now,” he said. “I would love us to be in a situation where the American people decide let’s not have abortion. But that’s not where we are. That’s why I think the most effective next step is to have the court return the decision with regards to abortion to the American people and their elected representatives.”

“And it is my preference that would return to the states and to the people and their elected representatives the issue of abortion as opposed to having the federal government impose, the Supreme Court impose its view on a one-vote majority. But that’s something that will be up to the court. That’s not something I can decide as president, that’s something which the court would have to decide,” Romney continued. Read the rest at Life News.com


Dad Learns to Unconditionally Love Daughter He Wanted Aborted via Life News

ESPN airs a weekly show called “E:60.” This investigative hour-long show highlights stories – often personal, touching, and sometimes tragic ones – related to sports. On October 1, ESPN posted a segment of “E:60″ called “Perfect” to YouTube. “Perfect” is nothing less than a gripping, life-changing tale.

Heath White, a military man, marathon runner, and all-around success story, was suddenly faced with a choice. During his wife’s second pregnancy, Heath discovered that his new daughter would be born less than perfect, to his way of thinking. Heath admits that he pressured his wife to have an abortion, yet she bravely refused. Read the rest of the story at Life News.com and watch the video!

E:60 – Perfect


ACOG Preventing Doctors From Objecting to Abortions (via Life News.com)

by Michael Fragoso | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com 

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Board of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ABOG) are restricting opportunities for healthcare professionals to object to abortion and contraception on grounds of conscience. This will accelerate the growing problem of physician shortage.

Against the backdrop of current debates about health care and conscience protection, a federal judge for the District of New Jersey has issued a temporary restraining order against the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) that prohibits them from forcing twelve nurses to assist in abortions against their conscientious objections. While much has been written on medical providers’ conscience rights as a moral imperative and as a means of maintaining diversity within the profession, the potential relationship between conscience and the supply of medical providers–in particular, obstetric specialists and nurses–should make the issue salient to anybody interested in health care reform, especially those seeking to expand access and reduce costs.

The contours of physicians’ conscience rights and their correlative obligations have been contested for decades. Indeed, the last half century has seen profound changes in both the practice of medicine and the state of law that necessarily implicate the position of the physician vis-à-visthe patient and the procedures that the physician may be asked to provide. As Azgad Gold notes, increasingly “the medical field became more ‘subjective’ than ‘objective,’ as reflected by the shift to measuring outcomes of treatments by ‘quality of life’ parameters rather than the traditional objective ‘morbidity’ and ‘mortality’ parameters.” This, coupled with the liberalization of abortion following Roe v. Wade, has increased internal and external pressures on the medical field to see abortion as simply another valid medical choice to which the patient is subjectively entitled, regardless of the ethical–or medical–views of her attending physician.

Nevertheless mainstream medical ethics maintains that physicians have the right to refuse service to patients. It is a professional prerogative that covers everything from a disagreement over the soundness of a requested procedure to wanting to avoid notorious bill dodgers. Furthermore, on atraditional understanding, “hospital employees have the right to refuse to participate in performing an abortion, and a hospital cannot dismiss the employee for insubordination. An employee can abstain from assisting in an abortion procedure as a matter of conscience or religious conviction.”

On the other side of this debate, there is a sense that the principle of “patient autonomy” should be paramount, and what is conscientious objection to one person is burdensome refusal to another. Under this view,

The widely accepted ethical principle that patients are autonomous individuals with the right to make the final decisions concerning their medical care, along with the corresponding principle that appears in all medical professionals’ codes of ethics that the ‘patient’s interest comes first’ leads to the following general rule: patient care decisions should be based on patient autonomy, as mediated by the clinician’s conclusion that the requested therapy (1) is not medically contraindicated (since it is both medically effective and not considered unethical within the profession’s generally accepted concept of ethical practice) and (2) is not illegal. Read the rest at Life News.com http://www.lifenews.com/2011/12/06/acog-preventing-doctors-from-objecting-to-abortions/


The Right to Life is for Everyone, and not Just the Unborn (via The Tree of Mamre)

The Right to Life is for Everyone, and not Just the Unborn Jim Gourdie of Conservatives on Fire comments on a recent case in Florida where a mother and father sued a doctor because of the birth of their son: On September 9, a West Palm Beach jury awarded parents Rodolfo Santana and Ana Mejia $4.5 million because they did not get accurate information from Dr. Marie Morel and OB/GYN Specialists of the Palm Beaches. Their son Bryan Santana, now age 3, was born disabled. He has no arms and only one leg. The … Read More

via The Tree of Mamre


Legislators Find Roe v. Wade Loophole. (via Rivers of Hope)

Legislators Find Roe v. Wade Loophole. AP Images/Rogelio V. Solis In what appears to be a loophole in the famous Roe v. Wade decision that paved the way for legal abortions, Congresswoman Sandy Adams has co-sponsored a bill that would legislatively end the nation’s policy of unlimited abortion-on-demand. Dubbed the Life at Conception Act, 105 members of the U.S. Congress co-sponsored the pro-life legislation. The bill aims to leverage the fact that the Supreme Court never actually dec … Read More

via Rivers of Hope


America’s Inconvenient Genocide 1973 thru 2011 (via Voting American)

We have in power an administration that is actively promoting abortion and threatening states that are attempting to defund planned parenthood. Are they the first to do so? No, the behind the curtain public funding of abortion has been going on for a long time, but this is the first time that we have had this kind of threats despite the wishes of the American people. This President, Barack Obama embraces death in every action that he takes and it is time that we went the other wan and choose a President and other leaders that embrace life!

America's Inconvenient Genocide 1973 thru 2011  United States Sees 53 Million Abortions Since Roe in 1973 by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com Americans saw a political milestone this month as more pro-life lawmakers were elected to the House of Representatives than ever before, but the nation also quietly reached a less joyful mark. In January, the National Right to Life Committee p … Read More

via Voting American


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,005 other followers