|American Minute with Bill FedererFEB. 16 – White Slaves-Muslim Masters & the Barbary Wars|
“The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco,” stated President Obama in Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009.
Explaining this, Governor William Bradford wrote that in 1625, a Pilgrim ship was returning to England with dried fish and 800 lbs of beaver skins to trade for supplies:
“They…were well within the England channel, almost in sight of Plymouth. But…there she was unhapply taken by a Turkish man-
of-war and carried off to Morocco where the captain and crew were made slaves.”
Muslim pirates of Morocco raided European coasts and carried away over a million to the North African slave markets, where also they sold tens of millions of Africans into slavery.
In 1627, Algerian Muslim pirates, led by Murat Reis the Younger, raided Iceland, and carried 400 into slavery.
One captured girl, who had been made a slave concubine in Algeria, was rescued back by King Christian IV of Denmark.
On June 20, 1631, the entire village of Baltimore, Ireland, “The Stolen Village,” was captured by Muslim pirates.
Only two ever returned. Thomas Osborne Davis wrote in his poem, “The Sack of Baltimore” (1895):
“The yell of ‘Allah!’ breaks above the shriek and roar;
O’blessed God! the Algerine is lord of Baltimore.”
Kidnapped Englishman Francis Knight wrote:
“I arrived in Algiers, that city fatal to all Christians and the butchery of mankind.”
Moroccan Sultan Moulay Ismail had 500 wives and forced 25,000 white slaves to build his palace at Meknes. He was witnessed to have killed an African slave just to try out a new hatchet he was given.
The Catholic Order “Trinitarians” collected alms to ransom slaves.
In 1785, Morocco recognized the new country of the United States by capturing two American ships and demanding tribute.
Thomas Jefferson wrote to John Jay, 1787:
“There is an order of priests called the Mathurins, the object of whose institution is to beg alms for the redemption of captives.
They keep members always in Barbary, searching out the captives of their country, and redeem, I believe, on better terms than any other body, public or private.
It occurred to me, that their agency might be obtained for the redemption of our prisoners at Algiers.”
Thomas Jefferson wrote to William Carmichael, 1786:
“Mr. Adams and I had conferences with a Tripoline ambassador, named Abdrahaman. He asked us thirty thousand guineas for a peace with his court.”
Jefferson reported to John Jay,” March 28, 1786:
“The Ambassador answered us that it was…written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged Islam’s authority were sinners, that it was their…duty to make war upon them…and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners.”
Jefferson purchased a Qur’an to understand the enemy.
Despite paying nearly 20 percent of the U.S. Federal budget as extortion payments, the Muslims continued their piracy.
When Jefferson became President, he finally sent in the U.S. Marines to stop Morocco’s Barbary pirates.
In his First Annual Message, December 8, 1801, Thomas Jefferson stated:
“Tripoli…of the Barbary States, had come forward with demands unfounded either in right or in compact, and had permitted itself to (announce) war on our failure to comply before a given day. The style of the demand admitted but one answer.
I sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean, with assurances to that power of our sincere desire to remain in peace, but with orders to protect our commerce against the threatened attack. “
On December 29, 1803, the new 36-gun USS Philadelphia ran aground on Morocco’s shallow coast and Muslim pirates captured and imprisoned Captain William Bainbridge and his 307 man crew for 18 months.
To prevent the ship from being used by the Muslim Barbary pirates, Lieut. Stephen Decatur, FEBRUARY 16, 1804, sailed his ship, the Intrepid, into the pirate harbor of Tripoli, burned the captured U.S. frigate “Philadelphia” and escaped amidst enemy fire. British
Admiral Horatio Nelson called it the “most bold and daring act of the age,”
The Marines later captured Tripoli and forced the Pasha to make peace on U.S. terms.
Frederick Leiner wrote in The End of the Barbary Terror-America’s 1815 War Against the Pirates of North Africa (Oxford University Press):
“Commodore Stephen Decatur and diplomat William Shaler withdrew to consult in private…The Algerians were believed to be masters of duplicity, willing to make agreements and break them as they found convenient.”
The annotated John Quincy Adams-A Bibliography, compiled by Lynn H. Parsons (Westport, CT, 1993, p. 41, entry#194), contains “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War and on Greece,” published in The American Annual Register for 1827-28-29 (NY: 1830):
“Our gallant Commodore Stephen Decatur had chastised the pirate of Algiers…The Dey (Omar Bashaw)…disdained to conceal his intentions;
Get the book, What Every American Needs to Know About the Qur’an-A History of Islam & the United States
‘My power,’ said he, ‘has been wrested from my hands; draw ye the treaty at your pleasure, and I will sign it; but beware of the moment, when I shall recover my power, for with that moment, your treaty shall be waste paper.’”
America’s war with the Muslim Barbary Pirates was the country’s first war after the Revolution, giving rise to the Marine Anthem:
“From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli.”
American Minute is a registered trademark. Permission is granted to forward. reprint or duplicate with acknowledgement to vwww.AmericanMinute.com
ASSAULT ON FREE SPEECH ALERT: CAIR Pressures; WordPress Caves. Takes Down Bare Naked Islam’s Website
Market Watch has published a news release from CAIR bragging about being responsible for Bare Naked Islam’s Take Down,, CAIR and organization the FBI considers an affiliate of various Islamic Terrorist Organizations described BNI as a hate site. read it here
It would seem. according to CAIR, if you have a website and you speak out about Islamic Terrorists who are trying to kill you, beheading, stoning women on trumped up charges, burning Christian Churches, killing Christians and other atrocities you are running a hate site…”
As of this posting, the 411 behind the takedown of BNI continues to unfold.
Since my schedule may not permit me to keep you posted on the turn of events, for updated information on the takedown of BNI, please pay a visit to Grumpy’s Opinions.
What has Bare Naked Islam (BNI) done wrong? Not a darn thing.
What they have done and I hope will continue to do is shine a bright light on CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, atrocities committed by Islamic factions in the name of Shariah Law against men, women, children, Christians, and non-Muslims throughout the world many of whom are closely linked to these two organizations.
BNI has also reported on the Obama administration’s more than friendly relationship with organizations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood and the danger it poses to the United States and Europe.
Of course, CAIR claims that the reason BNI’s site was taken down is because of threats posted on BNI’s site. It should be noted, however, that CAIR, a Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood front is famous silencing voices of opposition.
A threat to free speech is a threat to us all and should not be ignored or tolerated.
This is PC gone to hell in a hand basket and nothing more than attack on free speech.
If you are as apoplectic about as I am about WordPress caving to such an extreme entity, you can contact via email WordPress Support at firstname.lastname@example.org to inform them accordingly.
In the event you are unfamiliar with CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood, feel free to check out these articles to familiarize yourself entitled, “CAIRful” and “FBI, Senators recommend ban on terror-related CAIR, CAIR hires Democratic Senator.”
As for WordPress,
continue reading at Pumabydesign
- Bare Naked Islam’s Website has been taken Down (grumpyelder.com)
- WARNING to CONSERVATIVE BLOGGERS, (grumpyelder.com)
- Believe it or not, Public Schools allow terrorist linked CAIR to indoctrinate students (grumpyelder.com)
- Hamas Front Group CAIR Bullies WordPress.com into Shutting Down “Bare Naked Islam”(via 1389 Blog-Counterjihad) (loopyloo305.com)
- WordPress Takes Down “Bare Naked Islam” Blog After Threats From CAIR (actualgrit.wordpress.com)
- BNI Shut Down Again, Hamas-Tied CAIR Does Victory Dance (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
- Judge upholds CAIR official’s conviction in terrorism funding case (grumpyelder.com)
Two weeks ago, I found myself directly in the crosshairs of the growing conflict between Shariah law and our Constitution.
The Oxford Dictionary of Islam defines “Shariah law” as “God’s eternal and immutable will for humanity, as expressed in the Quran and Muhammad’s example (Sunnah), considered binding for all believers.”
In practical terms, “Shariah” also describes a movement under way in European and American legal systems to overturn Western civilization through the imposition of Islamic law and culture. As a constitutional attorney, I can tell you firsthand that this phenomenon is accelerating at an alarming rate.
++Hotel cancels conference on Shariah law.
In fact, on Friday I will be speaking at an important national conference on the impact of Shariah law on the U.S. Constitution. This conference was originally scheduled to be held at the Hutton Hotel in Nashville, Tennessee. But just days ago, Hutton Hotel banned the conference and cancelled a perfectly valid contract, claiming “safety concerns.”
The fact is, private companies and municipalities are facing more and more pressure to cater to or adopt special rules for Muslims. In one recent case, Muslim workers claimed “unfair labor practices” because they were told to clock out before taking prayer breaks. In another instance, claims of discrimination were leveled when Muslim women were told not to wear their head scarves for safety reasons before going on a roller coaster.
And now in courts of law across this nation, Shariah law is already being applied in case after case.
++There are actually dozens of “Shariah law” cases in our courts!
A study by the Center for Security Policy found 50 state court cases that considered Shariah law. To make matters worse, these cases referenced differing variations of Shariah law from 16 countries. The study concluded, “[J]udges are making decisions deferring to Shariah law even when those decisions conflict with constitutional protections.”
The Center’s study was by no means exhaustive, but instead was taken from a “small sample of appellate published cases.” That means, in reality, Shariah law could be being applied in hundreds of other courtrooms across this nation!
++The greatest threat we face from radical Islam.
Patricia, the truth is, the greatest threat our nation now faces from radical Islam is not in the form of another 9/11 attack, but rather in the slow, steady, and systematic implementation of Shariah law.
It’s already happening in Europe where schools are adopting special rules for Muslim students during Rhamadan. Europe is so far gone that the Archbishop of Canterbury (the head of the Church of England) said that the adoption of Shariah law is “unavoidable” and the idea that “there is one law for everybody” is “a bit of a danger.”
++Liberty Counsel’s petition opposing Shariah law in our courts.
As I noted above, in just the last few days I have experienced firsthand the growing battle over Shariah law. When the Hutton Hotel in Nashville banned our conference on Shariah law, I immediately sent them a strongly worded Demand Letter objecting to their suppression of free speech rights.
It was then that I knew we had to do more immediately. That’s why, today, Liberty Counsel is launching a new Citizen Petition opposing the use of Shariah law in our courts and culture. I am asking you to be among the very first signers of this petition as, together, we build a grassroots coalition to stop Shariah law. Go here to sign:
The petition also supports Liberty Counsel’s “Demand Letter” sent to Hutton Hotel, and their owners at Amerimar Enterprises in Philadelphia, protesting their anti-free speech move to ban our conference. Go here to see our Demand Letter:
Liberty Counsel’s legal team will stand at the forefront of those confronting this growing challenge to our Constitution and way of life. But right now, I need your signature on this petition opposing Shariah law so I can demonstrate to companies, municipalities, political leaders, and even courts that citizens across America are taking a stand on this vital issue!
++Please sign in the next 36 hours!
One final note…
This Friday, I will be speaking at the conference on Shariah law that was unjustifiably and improperly treated by Hutton Hotel when they cancelled the contract to provide the conference venue. I want to tell those gathered that tens of thousands of citizens have taken a stand! So please sign the petition right now so I can report the total number of signers in the first 36 hours of our petition to those in attendance:
Thank you so much for your prayers, your support, and your action on behalf of our God-given liberties!
Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
This is important friends and needs to be passed on by as many people as possible. We are losing our Christian Heritage and Sharia is being installed in it’s place. This must not be allowed to happen on our watch. Please do what you can and pass this on to your blogs, FB, tweets, everywhere. This is vital to our future and our freedom!
That old Southern hospitality just ain’t what it used to be—at least not in the hotel business. An unforeseen development due to a sudden swarming of modern-day Yankeecarpetbaggers to the Land of Cotton? Not really. These days the radical carpetbaggers carry prayer rugs, wear taqiyahs and hijabs, and you won’t see them at any down-home Dixie barbeques unless they’re planning to cook a local Christian or two.
Okay…I was just kidding around with that “cook-a-Christian” crack. They don’t reallyfricassee Christians in America—yet. Festivities of that sort are still limited to Sharia-friendly places like Pakistan, Egypt, the Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and countlessother locations where the riotous adherents of the “Religion of Peace” are found in substantial numbers. Here in the good old U.S.A., the acolytes of Allah are content for the time being with merely infiltrating the government and intimidating poltroonish hostel-keepers like those operating the Hyatt Place Houston and the Hutton Hotel in Nashville into denying critics of Islam their free speech rights. Ask Pamela Geller, of the Atlas Shrugs blog, whose scheduled speaking engagements at both venues were abruptly cancelled. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), in the time-honored tradition of Don Corleone, made the hotels an ‘offer they couldn’t refuse’:
- The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Islamic supremacist groups are conducting an ongoing campaign to discredit and marginalize everyone who dares to stand up against the jihad and Islamic supremacism. Central to this campaign is pressure against any organization or venue that dares to host a freedom fighter — hence Hamas-linked CAIR’s efforts to intimidate the FBI and the military into dropping invitations to me and other counter-jihadists, and its pressure on universities and private groups that host events featuring pro-freedom activists. Read the rest at Be Sure You’re RIGHT, Then Go Ahead
Everytime we turn around we have more and more evidence that the Obama administration is choosing to side with muslims over Christians. It is almost a given that this administration has give approval, if not verbally but by their actions, for the killing off of Christians throughout the Middle East! This is being done with our tax money and without our permission my friends. We have seen the churches burned and Christians killed in Egypt and all the other African and Middle Eastern states where we are sending troops and money. Our soldiers are instructed to follow muslim ways even if they are Christian. They are told not to show any visible support for Christ or in many cases Bibles are burned. What gives Mr. Obama and his administration the right to do this in our name? Have we given him the authority? Why are our Congressional leaders not speaking out against the violence against Christians in these countries? They are quick to jump to the defense of any perceived threat against muslims in this country. Have we become, without our consent and knowledge, a country that supports the tenets of Islam? Wake up my friends, it is not just for physical freedom that is at risk here, but also your spiritual freedom. Read the story linked below and find your voice before you lose it forever!
Pastor about to be executed by Iranian government
Iranian Pastor Yousef Nadarkhani faces execution anytime from Thursday onwards after refusing to renounce his faith.
September 28, 2011
Iranian Pastor Yousef Nadarkhani is currently on trial in Rasht, Iran. He has appeared in court three times this week and each time has refused to renounce his faith when asked to do so by the court. If he does not recant his Christian faith, he could be executed at any time (on or after Thursday, September 29).
When asked to “repent” by the judges, Yousef stated, “Repent means to return. What should I return to? To the blasphemy that I had before my faith in Christ?” The judges replied, “To the religion of your ancestors, Islam.” To which he replied, “I cannot.”
Send an email to the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asking her to request the Iranian government to stop any attempt to execute Pastor Nadarkhani and to offer asylum to Pastor Nadarkhani and his family.
|Send an email to the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton immediately!|
It is very important that you forward this alert to your friends and family members.
Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association
What if a Muslim country, such as Iran, launched a nuclear attack against us, or if agents aligned with Pakistan using dirty bombs were to attack America? Would Barack Hussein Obama retaliate with nuclear force, as has been our stated policy since the 1950s? Would he even unleash a barrage of non-nuclear shock and awe that would level those countries so that they’d be incapable of striking a second time?
When queried in Japan in November 2009, Mr. Obama declined to defend President Harry Truman‘s nuclear attack on Hiroshima, despite it having saved hundreds of thousands of American soldiers who would have otherwise died trying to defeat the recalcitrant Japanese. Many on the left and in academia have gone so far as to characterize it as a display of American racism, questioning if we would have done so had the victims been British. They ignore the efficacy of how that one-time use of a nuclear weapon spared this country from ever being a victim of nuclear attack.
This is a question the president needs to be asked, given how he is a proponent of a doctrine labeledResponsibility to Protect, “R2P.” The question is, though, what is Mr. Obama’s conceptual understanding of the term “responsibility” and how will it influence the manner in which he wages war?
The past may be a guide. As with all references to “responsibility,” domestic or foreign, Obama sees responsibility as a type of sacrifice by the more powerful to those less powerful, be it redistribution of wealth or sacrificing one’s optimal protection when weighed against how it effects those he considers innocent. A nuclear response to a nuclear attack on us, or even a devastating shock and awe campaign, would certainly kill many non-combatants Obama would consider innocent.
The assumption that, as with all presidents, Mr. Obama would do what is best for America and Americans cannot be taken for granted. We’ve never before had a president who sees himself primarily as a citizen of the world and initiates policies not always in the best interests of America but in the interest of more important (to him) global goals: loans to Brazil for their offshore drilling, hundreds of millions to Palestinian Arabs and Muslim countries — increasing an already unbearable debt on Americans to do so. Not to mention how he has tried every which way to stop Arizonans (Americans) from protecting themselves from murder, rape, thievery, and destruction of their property from mobs cascading into our open borders — doing so, as he always does, by invoking some universalist “morality” and mission that, in his mind, supersede our parochial needs. He has reneged on our commitment for a space shield for our allies in Eastern Europe while offering it to Russia, a threat to America.
Indeed, Obama has spent much time traversing the globe apologizing to all those countries that he claims have been the target of “arrogant” American military power. Would he, then, be inclined to use the essence of American military power, its nuclear force? Many around the world will not be deterred from going nuclear against us unless it is unequivocally understood that they will be annihilated if they do so.
None of this is remotely to imply that the president would be sanguine if our country were attacked; rather, one wonders if he has the stomach to retaliate overwhelmingly against the attackers, especially since he could rationalize his reluctance in terms of a “higher morality” that says: we can’t bring back our dead by killing citizens elsewhere who did not pull the trigger against us. His dilemma will be compounded if a dirty bomb or EMP were launched against us not by a government per se but by a group of terrorists independent of a government which nonetheless gives them sanctuary. After all, the Arab/Muslim cause has been very adept and successful in demanding that its territories and people be spared retaliation by claiming that terrorism is the work of individuals and not a particular state or government — and Mr. Obama is part of that chorus.
Furthermore, are we certain that Mr. Obama considers American life more important than, say, Iranian life, or that there is something exceptional about America that warrants choosing it and its people over the exceptional nature he has equally granted other countries and peoples? Forget all these assumed notions that a president will always do what is best for Americans — it boils down to Mr. Obama’s moral compass. If he thinks the way I think he does, he may likely consider it immoral to kill Pakistanis in order to save Americans, or Canadians.
The question becomes more acute if the attack comes from a Muslim source. And that is because Mr. Obama demonstrates an unbreakable political and ethnic simpatico (though not necessarily religious) with Muslim causes and Muslim people to a degree not seen in any Western leader today or before. What president designates an entire government agency, NASA, to forgo its intrinsic purpose and changes it to Muslim Outreach?
Be it bowing to Saudi kings, funneling billions to Muslim causes around the world, ordering expandedimmigration of Muslims into this country, waxing poetic about the “holy” Koran, instituting White House Ramadan Dinners, and re-writing American history to pretend some type of significant early historical relationship with Islam, as well as maneuvering to transform ancient Jerusalem, the Jewish spiritual capital, into an Islamic capital — all of this shows a man whose identity and heart are very tied up with things Islamic. There is something operating within the bosom of Obama beyond so-called political even- handedness. It is a love affair.
Obama the Christian made his feelings clear in his book, The Audacity of Hope (pg.261), that if elected he would stand with Islam, no matter the prevailing winds against it. And why not? His family back in Africa is Islamic. In his Cairo speech he said America will never be at war with Islam and that he sees his duty as president of the United States to fight against any type of stereotyping of Islam, no matter where. Would he be willing, then, to use nuclear armaments against a society he endlessly keeps telling us is peace-loving and full of compassion and justice?
Deep down, Obama may consider such wholesale retaliation as racist, since its victims are of a darker skin color than Anglos. One cannot minimize the extent to which Obama and the left have expanded the definition of racism and how averting “racism” has become the centerpiece of all decision-making, overshadowing and surpassing even needs for defense. Even now, Obama leaves the country vulnerable to jihadist plans with his refusal to ever mention the name Islam or Islamic when forced to comment on the many attacks by young Islamists on this country during the past few years. He has done nothing to stop Iran from engineering its nuclear bomb and seems to be standing in the way of those who would like to protect us from a future nuclear inferno. Addressing the Manhattan Institute last week, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey warned of an Obama administration that implements policies that sacrifice an optimal protecting of Americans for what it considers even more important: making sure that there is no domestic backlash against Muslims. Read the rest at American Thinker
- Russia Reports Nuclear Explosions Hit Vast US Military Tunnel Network. Sept 27 2011, maximum alert drill, Obama in Denver. Cia moves to Denver. (worldnewsrecord.wordpress.com)
Kalb, or dog, is one of the worst possible insults in the Muslim world.Kalb, or dog, is one of the worst possible insults in the Muslim world. Call a man Kalb or Kalb ibn Kalb, if you want the knives to come out. In Afghanistan, those who fled the Taliban and returned to help the Coalition rebuild the country are called “Sag shouey” or “Dog washers” since Americans are infidel dogs and the Afghans who cooperate with Americans are menial servants of the dogs.
Mohammed, in addition to his affinity for pre-teen girls also had a compulsive hatred of dogs. Some Hadiths quote him ordering the killing of all dogs, others show him to be moderate ordering that only “‘black dogs” be killed. Which gives a special edge to the not uncommon description in the Muslim world of Obama as a “black dog”.
After Osama bin Laden‘s execution, an imam of the Al-Aqsa mosque castigated the“Western dogs” who had done it. And as it turned out a dog actually did accompany the SEAL team that took down Osama. Unlike the billions spent on trying to win over Pakistanis and Afghans, who went on aiding terrorists anyway– the dogs remained true and loyal friends.
On September 11th, among the first responders were our four footed friends who risked their livesclambering around the smoking rubble in search of survivors. Muslims believe that an angel cannot enter a home when a dog is inside. But after the Muslims had killed thousands of Americans, it was the dogs who acted as the angels finding the bodies where they could and helping give the families of the dead something to bury.
When Muslims plot terrorist attacks, it is the bomb sniffing dogs who serve as the front line of defense against them. Military dogs walk the front lines searching out Taliban explosives and have become primary targets of enemy snipers. At airports, we would do much better to fire the TSA’s gropers and luggage thieves, and dump the naked scanners, and replace them with dogs. The enemy may fool our politicians, our clergy and our law enforcement– but they will never fool a dog.
Back in Israel, my parents found a puppy that had fallen into the hands of Muslim youths who tortured and abused it. That puppy grew into a wise and intelligent animal that went into a rage at the sight of one of its tormentors. No matter how they dressed or how well they spoke, people could be fooled, but she could never be fooled.
On a bus passengers would sometimes take issue with the fury that poured out of her when scenting a member of a creed whose holy books say, “Allah’s Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed”. When the rash of bus bombings began, carried out by terrorists who occasionally disguised themselves as Israelis, that canine scrutiny and anger would have been invaluable.
How can a dog tell the difference between a Muslim and a non-Muslim even when there are no racial or ethnic differences? There may be no physical differences, but there are moral ones. It may be the casual cruelty that Islam inculcates in its followers that is as visible in the body language and attitude to a sensitive animal– as a gun is to an airport metal detector.
In Iran, visitors tell of dogs who could distinguish between Zoroastrians and Muslims; “In Sharifabad the dogs distinguished clearly between Moslem and Zoroastrian, and were prepared to go…full of hope, into a crowded Zoroastrian assembly, or to fall asleep trustfully in a Zoroastrian lane, but would flee as before Satan from a group of Moslem boys.”
In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the dog is still a particular object of Muslim hatred. In Tehran an Islamic judge sentenced a 70 year old man to four months in jail and thirty lashes for walking his dog. And the parliament is once again tackling a law to outlaw dogs for posing a “cultural problem”.
This particular “cultural problem” has been exported with Islamic immigration as cabbies deny rides to the blind because their seeing eye dogs will keep angels out of their cabs. Blind passengers have been thrown off public buses by Muslim bus drivers and disabled people in all walks of life have faced harassment due to Islamic ‘Dogophobia’ which translates easily into bigotry against disabled people.
The “cultural problem” doesn’t begin or end with dogs. One Hadith states; “When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer.” Along with Dogophobia, the teachings of Islam also cultivate Anti-Semitism and Sexism. All far more serious problems than the constant defensive refrain of Islamophobia taken up by Muslim groups and their media panderers. Call a man Kalb or Kalb ibn Kalb, if you want the knives to come out. In Afghanistan, those who fled the Taliban and returned to help the Coalition rebuild the country are called “Sag shouey” or “Dog washers” since Americans are infidel dogs and the Afghans who cooperate with Americans are menial servants of the dogs.
Read the rest at Sultan Knish……