About these ads

Attempting to obey God and follow Jesus Christ our Lord

How Real Is Rick Perry?

Pop art Portrait of Rick PerryImage via Wikipedia

Since the media started reporting that Perry was going to enter the race for the GOP nomination, I have questioned the excitement that seem to go through the blogosphere and the mainstream media. I will be honest and say that I just don’t see the reason for the excitement. Looking at his body of work, I don’t see a lot that he has actually done.

As we learned with George W. Bush, being governor of a large state like Texas that is run more by the Lt. Governor than the Governor doesn’t get you much except a public figure that is in the news more for what the state itself does, than what he does. I see Perry as a typical politician that panders to what he thinks that the people he represents wants to hear. This is a time that we need something more. We don’t need the typical politician and although Perry has a pretty face and talks the talk, is there more to him than meets the eye?

There are plenty of articles out there that talk about what he has done and what he supports or does not support but one thing that really bothers me is his possible ties with Islam. Sultan Knish has an excellent article about that and I have posted a portion of it here but please read all of it at his site!

Call me contrary but I tend to look askance at people that the media get excited over and that main line, so called real Republicans, think is right for America. Since these are the same people that got us into the mess that we are in, I see no reason to either trust them or accept their insistence that they know what is best for us! This election is too important for the future of this country than to blindly accept anyone’s word. I hope that we have learned our lesson and are willing to take the time to investigate each candidate and decide if what they have done in the past will tell us what they will do in the future.

I am not willing to accept anyone’s word that they have changed unless their is ample proof to go along with it. It is easy to tell people what they want to hear. That is how Barack Obama got elected. We must make sure there there is substance in the next person who is elected to represent us, not just a bully with a pretty face and empty rhetoric!

Rick Perry and Islam – by Sultan Knish

Monday, August 15, 2011


Some questions have been raised about Rick Perry’s views on Islam. Islamic infiltration into American politics means that every candidate deserves close scrutiny. My purpose is not to attack Perry, but to conduct a preliminary discussion of the subject. Pamela Geller and Debbie Schlussel have written their own articles, which add more pieces to the puzzle. As with every candidate, the discussion will go on as more materials are brought forward.

Perry at the signing of the Texas Halal Law

First of all it’s important to recognize that the Rick Perry question, is also the Chris Christie question, it’s the question that comes with every governor from a state with a large and politically active Muslim population. This question will have more serious implications as the size of the Muslim population expands even further.

The multicultural pandering that used to be associated with the Tammany Hall political machine has become second nature in American politics. There is hardly a governor who does not pay lip service to diversity or do roundups of all the religious groups in America. That’s an unfortunate reality.

The initial good news is that Rick Perry did not try to influence the judicial system on behalf of a member of a terrorist organization, or appoint a terrorist Imam’s political affiliate to a superior court judgeship the way that Christie did.

The worst thing he seems to have done is played footsie with the Aga Khan and appointed one of his people to the State Health Council. He also seems to have met with a group of black clergy, which included a Nation of Islam minister, and made the usual trips to Dubai to talk up trade and academic exchanges.

Then there’s the Texas Halal Law, which makes it a criminal offense to sell Halal and non-Halal meat in the same store, without specifically labeling the two, and of misrepresenting non-Halal meat as being Halal. In theory that’s not such a big deal. Similar laws are on the books for Kosher meat. But the problem comes with the definition of what Halal is.

“Halal,” as applied to food, means food prepared and served in conformity with Islamic religious requirements according to a recognized Islamic authority.

That comes from the bill’s definition. And it raises the question of who is recognized as an Islamic authority. HB 470 leaves that question open. But in a dispute over which Islamic definition of Halal to use, the State of Texas would be forced to rule on a question of Islamic law. And to enforce that law. Texas would become an enforcer of Sharia.

The Texas Halal Law was lobbied for by Mohamed Elibiary and his Freedom and Justice Foundation and is quoted in a recent article about their positive relationship with Perry. Elibiary has spoken at an event honoring the Ayatollah Khomeini and recommends the writings of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. Last year he wrote an op-ed warning against assassinating Al-Qaeda leaders. And of course he’s busyeducating Americans about Sharia.

At the signing, Perry made a point of thanking Imam Bakhash for all that he does. Bakhash also appears to be one of the judges on the Texas Islamic Court, whose decisions have been upheld as binding by Texas appellate courts.

Then there’s Perry’s friendly relationship with Farouk Shami, who has a rather ugly background when it comes to Israel, and who suggested that 9/11 might be a conspiracy. He is the Palestinian in the Perry quote mentioned below.

Believe it or not, all this is the good news. It’s a sad commentary on the state of Islamic infiltration that this is business as usual in state politics. The bad news is that this means Perry’s as bad on Islam as George W. Bush. Maybe worse.

Like most of the world’s major religions, the Islamic faith preaches peace, love and tolerance. Indeed, terrorism is the antithesis of the basic tenet to which the one billion Islamic followers all over the world adhere.

The Koran teaches that “whoever killed a human being, except as punishment for murder or other villainy in the land, shall be regarded as having killed all mankind; and that whoever saved a human life shall be regarded as having served all mankind.”

The heartfelt condolences and overtures of cooperation that have been offered by Islamic communities in Texas portray the true spirit of Islam.

That’s from a post 9/11 editorial. And it’s echoed elsewhere. Perry’s views haven’t changed since. Witness this NPR piece from last year.

The governor of this swiftly changing state works to take a nuanced approach to a minority group that’s been very much at the center of the news. “We have a huge Muslim community in the state of Texas,” he says, and many of these Muslims are “great businessmen and women, very good supporters of mine. … We are an incredibly diverse state. I sell it as part of our strength.”

Perry was asked if he was comfortable with the way that some people talk about the problem with terrorism — their concern to say that the real problem is “Muslims” or “Muslim countries.”

“The radicalization of Islam is a great concern,” Perry said. “Islam of and by itself is one of the great religions, along with Christianity and Judaism.” He recalled meeting one of the Democratic candidates for Texas governor in the recent election. “He’s a Palestinian. And he and I were having a conversation about Ground Zero. How do you deal with this? He said, well, it’s pretty easy. He said, ‘Build a synagogue, a temple, and a church there.  And bring these people together.’”

How problematic is this? Again this is Bush territory. It’s insipid and dangerously ignorant. It’s one thing to hear it from the governor of a state with a sizable Muslim population. But it’s inappropriate for a president. And yet it’s also inevitable.

As some have pointed out, Perry is pro-Israel. So was Bush. It didn’t stop him from toadying to Saudi Arabia and Abbas, or from pressuring Israel to make concessions to terrorists during his second term. It’s possible to be pro-Israel and pro-Islam. And when the scales are weighed, then Islam comes first. If you doubt that, go look at what happened when Bush was pressured by the Saudis.

But this isn’t about Israel. It’s about Islam. Specifically it’s about addressing the threat of Islamic terrorism.

Perry has pandered on Mexican illegal immigration and on Islamic terrorism, as Bush did before him. Will he keep it up once he gets elected the way that Bush did? Hard to say, but the odds are good that he will. Read the rest at  Sultan Knish:

About these ads

5 responses

  1. Excellent post, Loopy. We must vet our candidates thoroughly. We certainly cannot trust the media to do so.

    August 16, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    • Thank you Free! I am not sure we can trust the media with anything anymore!

      August 16, 2011 at 1:41 pm

      • txoma

        AMEN! We have to do research on all those running … if Americans don’t they will end up with trouble.

        September 28, 2011 at 1:03 am

        • Absolutely right txoma!

          September 28, 2011 at 1:57 am

  2. Pingback: How Real Is Rick Perry? (via My Blog) | YOU DECIDE

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,961 other followers